Counterfactual design
Workers, workplace geography, and random seed are held fixed so the comparison isolates the policy regime.
Pablo Zavala · AI Safety Evaluation · Research Engineering
An agent-based NetLogo model of a small labor market adjusting to AI automation. With identical workers, geography, and random seed, peak unemployment reaches 14.3 percent under a tech-driven policy regime versus 3.6 percent under a human-centric one.
14.3 percent vs 3.6 percent peak unemployment under paired policy regimes
Mechanism demonstration in a small simulated labor market, not a macro forecast.
Role: Simulation designer: paired-seed counterfactual, policy regimes, and reproducible benchmark.
Workers, workplace geography, and random seed are held fixed so the comparison isolates the policy regime.
The chart shows paired unemployment paths, making the policy-dependent peak visible rather than burying it in a table.
The result is a mechanism demonstration in a small simulated labor market, not a macroeconomic forecast.
Automation policy debates often treat labor-market impacts as exogenous, even though retraining capacity and adoption speed change the shock itself.
The NetLogo model compares a tech-driven regime with a human-centric regime while holding workers, geography, and random seed fixed.
A paired-seed counterfactual isolates the policy regime, with local spillovers and a capacity-constrained training system driving the dynamics.
Peak unemployment reaches 14.3 percent under the tech-driven regime and 3.6 percent under the human-centric regime.
The model is a small simulated labor market, so the result is a mechanism demonstration rather than a macro forecast.
The public repository includes the NetLogo model, seeded benchmarks, and generated figures.